Achieving Business Agility at Small to Mid-Scale (online book)FLEXSteps of FLEX
Related articlesRelated online booksRecommended servicesResources
WebinarsWhat Is FLEX?FLEX (FLow for Enterprise Transformation) is an operating model based on systems-thinking, Lean-Thinking and the principles of product development flow. Its intention is to help guide organizations in achieving business agility – the quick realization of value predictably, sustainably and with high quality. It accomplishes this in a guided process that enables us to create an approach contextualized for us, but created from existing process patterns so that we do not need to reinvent the wheel. FLEX can be used to start with a tailored framework which we adjust over time as our skills increase, the understanding of your challenges deepen and as your organization changes. We can think of FLEX as providing us with a way to create an emerging framework controlling its emergence to be at the pace we need. FLEX takes advantage of other frameworks and methods by considering them tools to be used as applicable. FLEX can therefore provide a well-defined starting point based on another framework (such as Scrum or SAFe) or based on an analysis of where your organization is and what would be most appropriate for you to use. This enables FLEX to be tailored to any organization. How to improve from where you are is accomplished by attending to established Lean principles to guide next steps for improvement. This also means that you never outgrow FLEX in that it can automatically incorporate new ideas that are needed. A Quick Overview of FLEX“If you only quantify one thing, quantify the Cost of Delay” – Don Reinertsen FLEX guides us in achieving business agility by focusing on reducing the cost of delay in delivering value. “Cost of delay” is what it costs an organization in lost revenue, lost opportunity, increased risks, customer respect, etc., due to a delay in realization of value. Cost of delay can be reduced by focusing the enterprise’s capacity on what will achieve the greatest value in the shortest amount of time. It can do this by allocating the organization’s capacity to these items of greatest value. This is the effectiveness aspect of the equation. It can also become more efficient by attending to, among other things, the workflow being used, the structure of the teams involved, the size of the items being worked on, the number of the items being worked on, the visibility of the work and the agreements among the people in the organization. How changes are introduced and the roles of leadership and management is also critical. Although all organizations have differences in culture, objectives, people, and dynamics, we have found that all organizations need to accomplish the following in order to be effective. Before starting a transformation it is important to become clear on the goal we want to achieve – that is, be clear what an effective organization looks like. This enables us you to see what challenges you’ll need to overcome to achieve that. The steps to this are surprisingly similar for different organizations. The most significant ones are:
The figure shows these as part of a typical workflow. In a nutshell, discover what is most important, organize your people and allocate the capacity to the most important work. How each of the above actions are accomplished needs to be tailored to the company adopting the transformation. However, there is no reason to re-invent the wheel as patterns for all of these exist and can be readily applied to the organization.
It is important to have people make agreements that are organized around working together, not merely following an approach. These are laid out in our guardrails system. This is illustrated in the figure, “The Components of FLEX.” FLEX can be used for any size organization. We call it an ‘enterprise’ transformation because FLEX addresses issues from the beginning of the value stream through deployment. The value stream can be thought of as all of the steps that your work goes through from the initial concept until the value is realized. FLEX can stand on its own or can be laid on top of methods such as SAFe® (either to enhance it or to use it as a guideline). If you are doing SAFe or considering it, see the SAFe® and FLEX page. FLEX is based on the reality that how to do business development with a software component is reasonably well known now. The challenge is getting people to do what will work. Just saying “follow this” doesn’t work. To improve an organization’s methods, one must attend to:
FLEX takes what is known and provides a way to make a customized roadmap for a company’s transition. FLEX is not limited to any one approach but incorporates what works from all other methods. FLEX’s power is in how it makes those practices available to the current context in which it is being used. Using FLEXOne of the key aspects of FLEX that differentiates it from frameworks such as SAFe, LeSS, DAD and Nexus is that it is not just a framework but more of a way of thinking and an approach to manifesting improvement. FLEX acknowledges that people need something concrete and well-defined in order to start. At the same time, taking an all-in all-the-way approach to a predefined method has the following disadvantages:
You should undertake an Agile engagement in an Agile manner. That is, do something small, learn, adjust, do something more. This eliminates this seeming dilemma by providing people in the organization a straightforward, well-defined improvement step to begin with. Once enough progress has been done, the next step can be defined. While FLEX may initially require someone with experience to guide you, you can quickly learn how to guide yourself since it is based on principles and laws of software development. Once these are understood, you can determine your own path. See The Differentiators of FLEX for more. A six-part approach to a roadmapWhile avoiding prescribed solutions, FLEX suggests a phased approach to creating a customized roadmap that builds on patterns of success. Here are the phases:
Progress is guided by two types of metrics. The first is how much value is being manifested. The second is how well you are improving your development methods.
|